s
       

 

Home
chiefjudgesmith.com
(Under construction)

This accounting fraud is protected. The public is not.

This accounting fraud is protected. The public is not. In 25 years not one person has attempted to stop them from using our innocent sister or has attempted to expose their accounting. Their signature cover is to use a trusting family member to unwitting carry out their agenda of dividing, destabilizing, and disempowering, the family they victimize. Going right for the jugular under the guise of a fiduciary relationship appears to be the perfect cover. Secrecy is essential to the fraudsters and fatal to the family.

Believe it or not, the only protection the public has is for every member of the family learn to recognize the fraud patterns before it's too late. There is nothing you can do to stop them if one member of your family trusts them. They are ruthless. They are above the law. The secrecy is impenetrable.

If a just power doesn't stop them from using our innocent sister (Last known address: Jean O'Connell Nader, 444 Summit Street, New Kensington, Pennsylvania, 15068 Telephone 724 337-7537) to unwittingly carryout their agenda, they will continue to use her until it kills me.

I have been setup and character assassinated for thirty-one years. Their accountings remain concealed. I've lost most everything. After thirty-one years I believe it is fair to say the government will continue to protect the fraudsters instead of the public. The remaining hope is the media. The only reason I can think of for the media to not tell the public is the same reason the media hesitated to print the pentagon papers; that they would be sued for libel. I pray the press would not self censor. The institutional sordidness reminds me of the Dreyfus Affair. I believe Emile Zola's newspaper article "J'accuse" (I accuse) defending Alfred Dreyfus made him an enemy of the State.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreyfus_affair


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%27accuse%E2%80%A6!

Hooks

1,475 - 816 = 659

The pattern the fraudsters most don't want recognized is their hooks. Who ever controls the hooks controls the people and assets hooked. Hooks render the family powerless. See our other's "First thing" memo. They are invisible. In 25 years, not one person in the Court, in Fairfax County, or in Virginia, recognizes 1,475 - 816 = 659 (rounded from 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97) or the accounting entry at bk467p192 "Debt fm Harold O'Connell Trust . . . 659.97". It entangles the Trust accounting with the estate accounting. Small numbers are used to make them appear unworthy of attention, as if the issue were the amount and not that they entangle. The issue is that they entangle.

It is uncanny how well this simple example shows the dynamics. It entangles the accounting for the Testamentary Trust with the accounting for our Mother's Estate. It even shows why those who don't want the accounting exposed replace me with my sister, Jean Nader. I experience in accounting and try to expose their accounting trails and see where the money went. They've made Jean Nader so fearful she will not.

One indicator of the significance of 1,475 - 816 = 659 is the degree those in control go to to make it appear insignificant. Commissioner of Accounts Jesse Wilson III substituted my actual 12th Trust account with a fraudulent version in his Report to the Judges. The B&K law firm's Complaint removing me as Trustee says or implies that I should be removed as Trustee for trying to expose the accounting trail for the 659. www.659trail.com

They plant hooks (aka accounting entanglements, wedges, confusion and conflict, cover, obstacles,) in the accounting and make the family appear responsible for the consequences. Who ever controls the hooks controls the people and assets that are hooked. Hooks render the family powerless.

The lawyer Edward White frames me with the 659:

(1992, May 19; from Attorney Edward White's letter to Anthony O'Connell)
"The K-1 filed by the Trust showed a payment of $816.00 in interest to the estate. You sent a check in the amount of $1475.97 to the estate. What was the remaining $659.97? Do I have this confused with the tax debt/credit situation which ran from the Third Accounting?" 

Commissioner of Accounts Jesse B. Wilson, III, approves the 659 on March 20, 1993:

(1993, March 20; from the CPA Joanne Barnes and the Attorney Edward White's accounting at bk467p192, approved by Commissioner of Accounts Jesse B. Wilson III, on March 20, 1993.)
"Debt fm Harold O'Connell Trust . . . . . 659.97"

Trustee's actual 12th account (less pages 1 through 17 that are exhibits) addresses the 659:

1999.08.09 Anthony O'Connell to Jesse Wilson and Henry Mackall
(The Trust's Twelfth Court Account, covering the period from 1996.1.1 to 1996.12.31)
"A check for $63.00 is enclosed to file this Twelfth Account. This is not a Final Account.
The accounting for the Trust u/w of H. A. O'Connell was entangled with the accounting of the Estate of Jean M. O'Connell, fiduciary # 49160, by the CPA (firm) I hired and by the lawyer who is co-executor for the Estate:
Ms. Jo Anne Barnes, CPA (firm).
Bruner, Kane & McCarthy, Limited
700 North Fairfax
Alexandria, Virginia 22313
Mr. Edward White, Attorney and Co-Executor
P.0. Box 207
Kinsale, Virginia 22488 (Last known address)
Those who control the entanglements control the people and assets that are entangled. I have experienced the CPA-lawyer entanglements before and know it would be foolhardy to try to sell Accotink (my family's remaining real estate, B8845 p1444 and B8307 p1446) until all the entanglements are removed and the accountings are clear.
To keep this Twelth Account simple and clear I will only address one of the known entanglements. In short, the CPA (firm) did the Trust's Seventh Court Account in a manner that required me to pay the Estate $ 1,475.97. The lawyer discovers that this is $659.97 too much. I can't get the CPA (firm) or the lawyer to address this $659.97 debt much less pay it back. This one is easy to see because it is clearly stated in the beginning of the Estate accounting as a Debt from the Harold O'Connell Trust 659.97. If you review the attached pages 1 through 17 that are part of this Twelfth Account you may notice that:

  • The lawyer unilateraly hires the CPA into the Estate (page 1).
  • The lawyer will seek my sister's approval to sue me if I don't file the Trust's Seventh Court Account early (page 1). The combined advice of the CPA(firm) and the lawyer force me to file it approximately eighteen months earlier than the Commissioner's scheduled date of October 20, 1993, because I cannnot convince my sister, Jean Nader, that their combined advice is wrong (pages 5,6 and 7). This places the filing of the Trust Account before the filing of the Estate Tax Return that is due on June 15, 1992. This makes it easier to entangle the Trust accounting with the Estate Tax Return accounting and make it appear to my family that the estate was damaged by my management of the Trust.
  • The lawyer's letter of April 22, 1992 lists a Debt from the Harold O'Connell Trust   659.97 (page 3) even though I do not sign or submit the Trust's Seventh Court Account that created the $659.97 debt until May 11, 1992 (page 8). The lawyer's letter of May 19, 1992 makes it appear that he doesn’t know what this $659.97 is about and that it is my fault (pages 9 and 10).
  • This $659.97 debt is reported to the IRS (page 16 ). But when I ask the lawyer and CPA (firm) about this $659.97 debt they avoid it (page 15), don't know what I'm talking about (text box on page 16), or don't respond (page 17).

Do any of you have the power to compel the CPA (firm) and the lawyer to:
1. Explain why they created this $659.97 debt.
2. Explain why I am made to appear responsible for it.
3. Show exactly where this $ 659.97 debt is now.
4. Pay the $ 659.97 back from the estate to the trust.
5.  Do it without inflicting anymore cost and conflict on any member of my family.
I want to keep this simple but you have to understand that the CPA (firm) and the lawyer avoid accountability by using a trusting family member, with no accounting background, such as my sister, Jean Nader, co-executor, to cover for them. Please note the advice that the lawyer expects Jean Nader to rely upon in his letter of April 22, 1992. Jean Nader is innocent and is being used.  She does not understand that she is being used. She is not responsible for what the CPA (firm) and the lawyer did. She did not do the accounting. I did not do the accounting. The CPA (firm) and lawyer did the accounting. They will use Jean Nader again and again and again. She has been led to believe that keeping estate accountings a secrect is being loyal to our mother (which makes me appear disloyal). You have to go around Jean Nader to compel the CPA (firm) and the lawyer to be accountable. Please; positively, absolutely, completely, and without exception, do not allow the CPA (firm) and the lawyer to inflict anymore cost and conflict on any member of my family. If you don't have the power to compel the the CPA (firm) and the lawyer to expose and remove the entanglements they created, please understand how I can't.
I would appreciate any effort you might make. Thank you

Commissioner of Accounts Jesse B. Wilson, III, in his Report to the Judges, does not recogize the 659 he previously approved. Why did he not show my actual 12th account? The public should learn to recognize this pattern.

2000.08.08   (Jesse Wilson's Report to the Judges)
"To the Honorable Judges of Said Court:
RE: Estate of Harold A. OConnell, Trust
Fiduciary No. 21840
1. By a Tenth Account duly filed herein and approved by the undersigned on August 25, 1995, the trustee herein, Anthony M. O'Connell, properly accounted for all of the remaining assets reported as being assets of the trust created by the will of Harold OConnell and reported a zero balance on hand. A copy of said account is filed herewith as Exhibit 1.
2. By an Eleventh Account, Anthony M. OConnell, trustee, again reported zero assets on hand and no receipts or disbursements. A copy of said account is filed herewith as Exhibit 2.
3. Both the Tenth and Eleventh accounts carried the notation "This is not a final account".
4. In the ordinary case, an account which shows the distribution of all remaining assets is filed as a Final Account, and its approval terminates the fiduciary's responsibility to the Court and permits the Commissioner of Accounts to close the file.
5. The said trustee has also filed a Twelfth Account in which he reports as an asset $659.97 "due from the Estate of Jean M. OConnell".  A copy of that "account" is enclosed herewith as Exhibit 3.
6. The Estate of Jean M. OConnell, deceased, Fiduciary No. 49160, was closed in the Commissioner of Accounts office after approval of a Final Account on May 31, 1994.
7. The said $659.97 was the subject of correspondence between the said trustee and Edward J. White, attorney and co-executor of the estate of Jean M. OConnell, copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibits 4 and 5. In his letter,
Exhibit 5, the trustee explains that the $659.97 is part of a net income payment of $1,475.97 which the trust owed the estate of Jean M. OConnell. In that same letter, the trustee states that "At this point in time, I believe Mr. Balderson and I are of one mind that the estate does not owe the trust and the trust does not owe the estate".
Mr. Balderson was a CPA for the estate. Both of these letters were provided to the Commissioner of Accounts by the trustee in support of his "Twelfth Account".
8. The trustee also provided the Commissioner with a copy of a page from a "Jean M. OConnell estate tax analysis" which shows $659.97 under "Assets" of that estate as "Debt from Harold OConnell Trust".  A copy of that page is attached as Exhibits 6.
From a review of this information the Commissioner finds that there is no evidence to support an assertion by the trustee that the $659.97 is an asset of the trust. To the contrary, it appears that either it is not a debt at all, or, from the estate's point of view, it was money owed by the trust to the estate, i.e. an asset of the estate of Jean M. OConnell. That estate has been closed for more that six years.
Accordingly, the foregoing Eleventh Account of Anthony M. OConnell, Trustee has been marked a "Final Account" by the undersigned and is hereby approved as a Final Account in the trust under the will of Harold A. OConnell and is filed herewith.
In the event that the trustee is successful in recovering $659.97 or any other funds which are proper trust assets to be accounted for, such may be reported to the Commissioner of Accounts by an Amended Inventory and, thereafter, accounted for by proper accounts.

GIVEN under my hand this 8th day of August, 2000.
Respectfully submitted,
Jesse B. Wilson, III
Commissioner of Accounts
Fairfax County, Virginia
JBW:jcs
Enc.: Exhibits, 1 - 6
cc: Anthony M. OConnell, Trustee"
(See the exhibits in the pdf reference)

I filed an Exception to the Commissioner's Report. It disappeared after being received by the Court on August 23, 2000:



B&K's Complaint to remove me as Trustee:

(2012, August 30; from the Complaint prepared by the B&K law firm to remove me as Trustee.)
"29. On August 8, 2000, an Eleventh Account for the Harold Trust was approved by the Commissioner of Accounts for the Circuit Court of Fairfax County and determined to be a final account.
30. Anthony repeatedly and unsuccessfully challenged the Commissioner's determination and requested, inter alia, that the Court and the Commissioner of Accounts investigate a debt of $659.97 that he alleged was owed to the Harold Trust by Mrs. O'Connell's estate. In these proceedings, the Commissioner stated, and the court agreed, that there was no evidence to support Anthony's claims that a debt existed and, if so, that it was an asset of the Harold Trust.
31. Anthony's repeated and unsuccessful challenges to the rulings of the Commissioner of Accounts and the Circuit Court in connection with the Eleventh Account, and his persistence in pursuing his unfounded claims to the present day, demonstrate that he is unable to administer the Harold Trust effectively and reliably.
*32. It is in the best interests of the beneficiaries of the Harold Trust that, upon the sale of the Property, the net sale proceeds be distributed in an orderly and expedient manner*. Based on Anthony's actions, he is not the proper individual to fulfill the trustee's duties in administering the Harold Trust.
33. The removal of Anthony as trustee best serves the interests of the beneficiaries of the Harold Trust."

*I believe item 32 means they don't want anyeone to look at the accounting closely.

Summary. The public should know that they can be removed as a Fiduciary for exposing the accounting in the public record:



Mother    Son

Impenetrable secrecy

1985
1


 

(above) If Commissioner of Accounts Robert J. McClandish, Jr.. had not told our Mother and I that the testamentary trust described in our Father's Will had to be funded we would never have known. Our Father died in 1975 and his Will was probated in 1976. I believe our Mother's CPA Joanne Barnes, had been doing the accounting since 1976. I wonder how his Will could be probated without the Testamentary Trust being recognized and addressed. Was it for the same reasons that my 1992 Deed as Trustee is being ignored?  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com/deed-webs/deed-webs-home.html  

2

Hook homeplace




(above) SAVE    RE Est of HAOC    45,325.00
In answer to your letter of May 8, 1985 reguarding progress in establishing a trust required by the will with Anthony O'Connell as Trustee I would like to report that a co-trustee has agreeded to serve with him. Ms Jo Ann Barnes
Home address
7225 Pine Dr.
Annandale, VA 22003
354 - 0673
549-7800 -office
She will be working on this very soon with a lawyer.    I had hoped that the procedure of setting up the trust could be simplified by putting title to the resident estate (my home) in the names of my three children - the same as listed in the will to receive it to receive it.
There should be more definite progress soon and I will inform your office then
VTY
JMO'C Extrx
Sent 5/31/85
To Commissioner of Accounts
Sent 5/31/85

Hook homeplace and family

Our Mother's "I had hoped that the procedure of setting up the trust could be simplified by putting title to the resident estate (my home) in the names of my three children - the same as listed in the will to to receive it." is a huge hook. History suggests the CPA and lawyer advised her to do this. The lawyer's name is not mentioned. This suggests that she has been instructed to keep his name a secret. If I had known a lawyer was already onboard I would not have hired an attorney.

Mixing the Testamentary trust, our homeplace, and the three beneficiaries, would create a huge entanglement. Whoever controls the entanglements or hooks controls the people and assets that are entangled or hooked.

 

3

"Lawyer fix"

The public should know that the fraudsters and their colaborators will covertly have a member of your family come into to the Court and do something that effects you.

It's been more than 32 years now and whatever the lawyer fixed and had Jean O'Connell come into to the Court and do remains concealed. Was it to sign what the "lawyer fixed"? Was it something under the guise of a usual and customary document concerning a bond and/or non-resident fiduciaries, but the actual intent is to keep me away from the fraudsters accounting by blocking me from qualifying as Trustee? I have experience in accounting and try to expose their accounting.








1986.04.25   (Edward White to Henry Mackall, copy to Jean O'Connell)
"Enclosed is the draft by Ms. Barnes of the Final Accounting.
I have taken the liberty of correcting a typographical error on the distributions to reflect 53.9006% vice 3.9006%.
I would appreciate it if you would forward this to Mr. O'Connell and clarify with him his intention to qualify on May 1st.  If he does not agree or requests further delaying tactics, I feel that I have no other recourse in serving my client than to seek to have him removed as a Trustee.  This matter is costing Mrs. O'Connell dearly with the delay. Sincerely, Edward J. White 

1986.05.08   (Henry Mackal to Anthony O’Connell and H.A. Higham)
"Enclosed please find a copy of my letter to Mr. White together with copy of a proposed Petition and Order in connection with the bond problem we ran into when you attempted to qualify  [On May 1].  I have discussed this with Mr. White and expect no problem getting it entered.  If either of you have any objections to anything in either of these documents please let me know.
Sincerely, Henry C. Mackall”

4

"First thing" memo

"So Kaiser - Hilton
549-7800
Joanne,
My son Tony called.
He said he wanted very much to be the full trustee with an
agent to receive notices and processes from the
court and commissioner as in the May 8th letter.
Would
First thing is to have the final accounting
based on the same figures
as in the first accounting.
Send it to me - Do I have to sign it."  

"Call - Will do draft of final accting.-     
deed to property - convey to court.      
needs how much"
 

 

In May(?) of 1985 our Mother instructed her CPA Joanne Barnes to send her the final accounting for our Dad's estate. About fourteen months later the lawyer Ed White tells our Mother "Ms Barnes will contact you at the time your signature is needed." Our family is made to appear responsible.

"First thing is to have the final accounting
based on the same figures
as in the first accounting.
Send it to me - Do I have to sign it."  

The CPA ignored Jean O'Connell's instructions. The CPA planted hooks:

"Call - Will do draft of final accting.-     
deed to property - convey to court.      
needs how much"  

On June 26, 1986, the lawyer tells our Mother:

"Ms Barnes will contact you at the time your signature is needed."

The 14 month delay is blamed on the family fiduciary who they supplant:

"If he does not agree or requests further delaying tactics, I feel I have no other recourse in serving my client, than to seek to have him removed as a Trustee. This matter is costing Mrs. O'Connell dearly with the delay."

This is not an intellectual experience. It is gut wrenching. It destroyed my relationship with my Mother. Our Mother died believing I was the problem. I believed she was the problem until I found her "First thing" memo in her papers after her death in 1991.

1992
5

$518,903 disappears

1992.02.25 (Edward White to Anthony O'Connell, copy to Jean Nader)
"I have received your letter of February 24, 1992 in which you request that I reconsider my refusal to resign as co-executor of your mother's estate.
Once more I decline to take such action.
When your mother approached me about changing the co-executors of her will, we discussed the matter at length. She specifically desired to make the changes which are in effect now, and was quite firm in her decision. It would be clearly disloyal of me to dishonor her intentions.
If you are represented, I will be glad to discuss this matter with your counsel.
Sincerely, Edward J. White"

 

1992.03.30   (Anthony O'Connell to Edward White) (Copy to Jean Nader)
"I have a few questions I hope you would be kind enough to answer.
1. As you know, the Lynch Limited Partnership plans to pay my Mother's estate $545,820.43 on April 21, 1992. What is your best guess as to when and in what amount(s) you will make distribution(s) to the beneficiaries?
2. The license plates on my deceased Mother's Van expire in April of 1992. Virginia DMV requires a new title with the new owners name before they will issue new plates {The plates cannot be renewed by the co-executors signing for Jean O'Connell). The bank will give the co-executors the title if you simply pay them the interest on the loan. I understand the principal on the loan has been paid and I am guessing that the interest is something in the range of $1200 to $1400. Would you please pay the bank the interest so they will give you the title? What is your decision as to who gets the van and how much will it costs?
3. What is your fee for being co-executor of my mother's estate?
Yours truly, Anthony O'Connell "

1992.04.04   (Edward White to Anthony O'Connell, copy to Jean Nader)
"I have received your letter of March 30, 1992.
The answers are: 
Question 1. As soon as the money is received, the tax liabilities evaluated and upon consultation with the Co-Executor.
Question 2. Paid. It is not my decision as to what it will cost you, though I have been informed that you know full well.
Question 3.  2 Y % of the receipts into the probate estate if approved by the Commissioner of Accounts.
I would call to your attention that on two separate occasions I drove to Sovran and spent a lengthy period of time on the question of the car loan. I did this in person since: I knew that you had the vehicle, that your sisters wanted you to have it, that the insurance and tags were due to expire soon and I did not want you to be inconvenienced. I could have done all of this by mail and it probably would have taken about three months, knowing the nature of the loan problem. I assumed I was doing you a favor.
Now I receive you letter asking that I "simply pay them the interest" I paid the interest and principal in one check on March 12, received the title on March 22 and mailed it to Mrs. Nader to sign over to you on March 23. Have you any suggestions as to how it could have gone faster?
The information of the commission was given to you previously by Mrs. Nader.
I do not know what your problem is, but in the future, please address all correspondence to Mrs. Nader.
I am trying to be patient with you, but I find that this estate is time consuming enough without having to deal with letters such as the last two that I have received.
Sincerely, Edward J. White"











2012
6

Trustee Deed ignored






 

2012
7

Seventeen of my eighteen responses to the Complaint dissappeared
after being received by the Court on September 25, 2012 at 10:44am

Order
Signed by Chief Judge Smith on January 25, 2013
www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/order5p.pdf

VIRGINIA:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY
JEAN MARY O'CONNELL NADER, Plantiff
v
ANTHONY MINER O'CONNELL,
Individually and in his capacity as
Trustee under a Land Trust Agreement
Dated October 16, 1992 and as
Trustee under the Last Will and
Testament of Harold A. O'Connell, et al.
Defendants.
Case No. 2012-13064
ORDER
THIS CAUSE eame on to be heard upon the motion of the Plaintiff, Jean Mary
O'Connell Nader, by counsel, for summary judgment pursuant to Va. Sup. Ct. Rule 3:20; upon
the reply to the motion filed by Sheila Ann O'Connell, pro se; and upon the argument of counsel;
and
IT APPEARING TO THE COURT as follows:
1.The material facts set forth in the Complaint filed by Plaintiff in this action are
deemed to be admitted by Defendant Anthony M. O'Connell pursuant to Va. Sup. Ct. Rule
1:4(e);- based on the failure of Defendant Anthony M. O'Connell to deny such facts in the
responsive pleading filed by him, entitled "Response to Summons Served on September 8,
2012.
"
2. In her Answer to the Complaint and Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment, the
remaining party-in~interest, Defendant Sheila Aim O'Connell, agrees with the facts set forth in
the Complaint and the relief requested by Plaintiff.
3. Because there are no material facts in dispute in this action and the facts alleged
in the Complaint support the relief requested therein, summary judgment pursuant to Va. Sup.
Ct. Rule. 3:20 on all counts alleged in Plaintiff's Complaint is appropriate.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:
A. That judgment in favor of Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader as to Count I of
the Complaint be, and hereby is, granted; that Anthony Miner O'Connell is hereby removed as
trustee under the Land Trust Agreement dated October 16, 1992, pursuant to Va. Code § 64.21405
(formerly Va. Code § 26-48), effective immediately; and that all fees payable to Anthony
Minor O'Connell under the terms of the Land Trust Agreement, including but not limited to, the
trustee's compensation under paragraph 9~01, and ll interest on advancements by the trustee to .
the trust for payment of real estate taxes pursuant to paragraph 9.03; are hereby disallowed and
deemed forfeited;
B. That judgment in favor of Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader as to Count II of
the Complaint be, and hereby is, granted; that Anthony Minor O'Connell is hereby removed as
trustee of the trust created under the Last Will and Testament of Harold A. O'Connell, pursuant
to Va. Code § 64.2-759 (formerly Va. Code § 55-547.06), effective immediately;
C. That judgment in favor of PlaiIitiff as to Count III ofthe Complaint be, and
hereby is, granted; that Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader is hereby appointed as successor
trustee under the Land Trust Agreement and as trustee of he trust under the Last Will and
Testament of Harold A. O'Connell; that the term of the Land Trust Agreement is hereby
continued until further Order of this Court or until the real property held under the Land Trust is
sold and final distribution of the net proceeds is made to the trust's beneficiaries, whichever
occurs first; and that Plaintiff, as successor trustee Under the Land Trust Agreement, shall
proceed forthwith to sell the real property held by such trust as soon as reasonably practicable
upon such terms and conditions as she deems appropriate and consistent with her fiduciary
duties; and
D. That Plaintiff is hereby awarded her reasonable attorney's fees and costs in this
action in the amount of $ l7,504.12, to be paid from the Land Trust at such time as funds
become available.,
ENTERED this 25th day of January, 2013.
(Seal) (Editor's note: I am guessing that this is the signature of Chief Judge Dennis J. Smith but I am not sure).
Judge
I ASK FOR THIS:
BLANKINGSHIP & KEITH, P. C.·
4020 University Drive .
Suite 300
Fairfax, VA 22030
703~691-1235
FAX: 703-691-3913
By:
Elizabeth Chichester Morrogh, VSB No. 25112
BVMorrogh@bklawva.com
Jennifer L. McCammon, VSB No. 77034
JMcCammon@bklawva.com
Counsel for Plaintiff

Comment on:

"1. The material facts set forth in the Complaint filed by Plaintiff in this action are
deemed to be admitted by Defendant Anthony M. O'Connell pursuant to Va. Sup. Ct. Rule
1:4(e);- based on the failure of Defendant Anthony M. O'Connell to deny such facts in the
responsive pleading filed by him, entitled "Response to Summons Served on September 8,
2012.
"

Please look at my "Response to Summons Served on September 8, 2012." It included a complete copy of my Deed as Trustee. Ignoring my Deed as Trustee blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. No one recognizes this. No one. www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/overview62p.pdf

Please look at my seventeen responses that disappeared after being received by the Court on 9/25/2012 at 10:44 am.

 1   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/1-545820-23p.pdf
 2   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/2-bk467p191-8p.pdf
 3   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/3-blueprint4p.pdf
 4   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/4-canweconnectthedots2p.pdf
 5   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/5-codeofconduct18p.pdf
 6   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/6-commitments-Individually8p.pdf
 7   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/7-compute-tax-test35p.pdf
 8   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/8-exceptions1994disappeared.pdf
 9   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/9-exceptions2000disappeared.pdf
10  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/10-overview72p.pdf                          (Includes complete Deed)
11  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/11-percentages12p.pdf            
12  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/12-precedence17p.pdf
13  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/13-tax-records94p.pdf
14  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/14-trust-deed-invisible175p.pdf       (Includes complete Deed)
15  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/15-trust-documents42p.pdf              (Includes complete Deed)
16  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/16-unknown14p.pdf                         (Includes first 3 pages of Deed)
17  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/17-usingIRS15p.p
      www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/all-18responses714p.pdf                  (Includes multile copies of Deed)
   

Complaint - www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/complaint60p.pdf
My responses - www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/all18responses714p.pdf
My email verifying 18 responses - www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/email-verifying18responses3p.pdf
Order - www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/order5p.pdf

Ignore all below (May21, 2018)
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

The CPA and lawyer withhold the final account for our Father's estate.

If you are hiring an attorney for the whole family; never, never, allow secrecy between family members. Or your family may fall into the two attorney trap. Our Mother did not hire a lawyer to fight me. I did not hire a lawyer to fight our Mother. But it's made to look that way.

I believe the CPA unilateral brought the lawyer aboard like the lawyer unilaterally bought the CPA aboard in 1992 (See Edward White's letter of April 22,1992). The CPA and lawyer hid from me. I didn't know lawyer #1 existed. I hired a lawyer for the whole family because nothing was being done. To my surprise he become lawyer #2. This structurally divides the family. This structural divide was used to divide, destabilize, and disempower our family.

Learn to recogize hooks.

s is the pattern they most don't want recognized.

They plant hooks (aka accounting entanglements, wedges, confusion and conflict, cover, obstacles,) in the accounting and make the family appear responsible for the consequences. Who ever controls the hooks controls the people and assets that are hooked. Hooks render the family powerless.

Your trust is a hook as it is used here. Withholding the final account for our Dad's estate is a ook.

Withholding what you need is a hook. Ignoring my Deed as Trustee and never saying why is a hook. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money.

Hooks give those who control the hooks.

They plant hooks (aka accounting entanglements, wedges, confusion and conflict, cover, obstacles,) in the accounting and make the family appear responsible for the consequences. Who ever controls the hooks controls the people and assets that are hooked. Hooks render the family powerless.

Reognize the planting of hooks. Whoever controls the hooks (the accountants) controls the people and assets it hooks

They plant hooks (aka accounting entanglements, wedges, confusion and conflict, cover, obstacles,) in the accounting and make the family appear responsible for the consequences. Who ever controls the hooks controls the people and assets that are hooked. Hooks render the family powerless.

(1992, May 19; from Attorney Edward White's letter to Anthony O'Connell)
"The K-1 filed by the Trust showed a payment of $816.00 in interest to the estate. You sent a check in the amount of $1475.97 to the estate. What was the remaining $659.97? Do I have this confused with the tax debt/credit situation which ran from the Third Accounting?" 

(1993, March 20; from the CPA Joanne Barnes and the Attorney Edward White's accounting at bk467p192, approved by Commissioner of Accounts Jesse B. Wilson III, on March 20, 1993.)
"Debt fm Harold O'Connell Trust . . . . . 659.97"

(2012, August 30; from the Complaint prepared by the B&K law firm for our innocent sister Jean Nader to sign)
"29. On August 8, 2000, an Eleventh Account for the Harold Trust was approved by the Commissioner of Accounts for the Circuit Court of Fairfax County and determined to be a final account.
30. Anthony repeatedly and unsuccessfully challenged the Commissioner's determination and requested, inter alia, that the Court and the Commissioner of Accounts investigate a debt of $659.97 that he alleged was owed to the Harold Trust by Mrs. O'Connell's estate. In these proceedings, the Commissioner stated, and the court agreed, that there was no evidence to support Anthony's claims that a debt existed and, if so, that it was an asset of the Harold Trust.
31. Anthony's repeated and unsuccessful challenges to the rulings of the Commissioner of Accounts and the Circuit Court in connection with the Eleventh Account, and his persistence in pursuing his unfounded claims to the present day, demonstrate that he is unable to administer the Harold Trust effectively and reliably.
32. It is in the best interests of the beneficiaries of the Harold Trust that, upon the sale of the Property, the net sale proceeds be distributed in an orderly and expedient manner. Based on Anthony's actions, he is not the proper individual to fulfill the trustee's duties in administering the Harold Trust.
33. The removal of Anthony as trustee best serves the interests of the beneficiaries of the Harold Trust."

Comment:
Small numbers are used to make accounting hooks appear unworthy of attention, as if the issue were the amount. The issue is not the amount. The issue is they hook people and assets. Who ever controls the hook controls the people and assets that are hooked. Hooks render the family powerless:

Should the public trust those who Virgina holds out to the public to be automatically trusted? Should you vet them yourself by testing their transparency

1992

The 1,475 - 816 = 659 hook starts here

Mother    Son

If you are hiring an attorney for the whole family, never allow secrecy between family members. The CPA and lawyer destroyed my relationship with my Mother and then my relatioship with my sister by creating walls of secrecy and planting hooks.

(above) If Commissioner of Accounts Robert J. McClandish, Jr.. had not told our Mother and I that the testamentary trust described in our Father's Will had to be funded we would never have known. Our Father died in 1975 and his Will was probated in 1976. I believe our Mother's CPA Joanne Barnes, had been doing the accounting since 1976. I wonder how his Will could be probated without the Testamentary Trust being recognized and addressed. Was it for the same reasons that my 1992 Deed as Trustee is being ignored?  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com/deed-webs/deed-webs-home.html  

Beware of the two attorney setup. Our Mother assumes the CPA and lawyer are working for the good of the whole family. When I hired a lawyer for the whole family after nothing is being done, the lawyer that our Mother hired (More likely The CPA added him of her own volition) for the whole decides to represent only her. The lawyer I hired for the whole family decides he is only representing me. Presto; one lawyer represening one part of the family and one lawyer representing another part of the family. They will tear our family apart and supplaint the famly fiduciary and take control of family's assets. It is better to go without legal council than to fall for the two lawyer pattern.

2

"Lawyer fix"

The public should know that the fraudsters and their colaborators will covertly have a member of your family come into to the Court and do something that effects you.

It's been more than 32 years now and whatever the lawyer fixed and had Jean O'Connell come into to the Court and do remains concealed. Was it to sign what the "lawyer fixed"? Was it something under the guise of a usual and customary document concerning a bond and/or non-resident fiduciaries, but the actual intent is to keep me away from the fraudsters accounting by blocking me from qualifying as Trustee? I have experience in accounting and try to expose their accounting.

What did the fraudsters have our Mother come in to the Court and do?
  Call it document "X"

(above) What did the fraudsters have our Mother come in to the Court and do? That blocked me from qualifing as Trustee on May 1, 1986? That remains concealed? Call it document "bond problem"

3

"First thing"

Mother's agenda: First thing is to have the final accounting    Send it to me - Do I have to sign it."
Versus
CPA-lawyer's agenda:"Call - Will do draft of final accting.    deed to property - convey to court.    needs how much"  

Planting hooks. Whoever controls the hooks controls the people and assets that are hooked. The CPA and lawyer use the hooks to divide, destabilize, and disempower the family they victimize, supplant the family fiduciaries, take control of the family's assets, and make money disappear. "Will do draft of the final accting   deed to property - convey to court.   Needs how much.", are hooks.
In May(?) June(?) July(?) of 1985 - Our Mother tells her CPA "First thing is to have the final accounting based on same figures as in the 1st accting. Send it to me - do I have to sign it?" Twelve - fourteen months later, on June 26, 1992, the lawyer tells our Mother "Miss Barnes will contact you at the time your signature is needed."


"Call - Will do draftof final accting.-     
deed to property - convey to court.      
needs how much"    
 
Making me appear responsible.

"So Kaiser - Hilton
549-7800
Joanne,
My son Tony called.
He said he wanted very much to be the full trustee with an
agent to receive notices and processes from the
court and commissioner as in the May 8th letter.
Would
First thing is to have the final accounting
based on the same figures
as in the first accounting.
Send it to me - Do I have to sign it."  

"Call - Will do draft of final accting.-     
deed to property - convey to court.      
needs how much"  .

2012

6

Order
Signed by Chief Judge Smith on January 25, 2013
www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/order5p.pdf


VIRGINIA:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY
JEAN MARY O'CONNELL NADER, Plantiff
v
ANTHONY MINER O'CONNELL,
Individually and in his capacity as
Trustee under a Land Trust Agreement
Dated October 16, 1992 and as
Trustee under the Last Will and
Testament of Harold A. O'Connell, et al.
Defendants.
Case No. 2012-13064
ORDER
THIS CAUSE eame on to be heard upon the motion of the Plaintiff, Jean Mary
O'Connell Nader, by counsel, for summary judgment pursuant to Va. Sup. Ct. Rule 3:20; upon
the reply to the motion filed by Sheila Ann O'Connell, pro se; and upon the argument of counsel;
and
IT APPEARING TO THE COURT as follows:
1.The material facts set forth in the Complaint filed by Plaintiff in this action are
deemed to be admitted by Defendant Anthony M. O'Connell pursuant to Va. Sup. Ct. Rule
1:4(e);- based on the failure of Defendant Anthony M. O'Connell to deny such facts in the
responsive pleading filed by him, entitled "Response to Summons Served on September 8,
2012.
"
2. In her Answer to the Complaint and Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment, the
remaining party-in~interest, Defendant Sheila Aim O'Connell, agrees with the facts set forth in
the Complaint and the relief requested by Plaintiff.
3. Because there are no material facts in dispute in this action and the facts alleged
in the Complaint support the relief requested therein, summary judgment pursuant to Va. Sup.
Ct. Rule. 3:20 on all counts alleged in Plaintiff's Complaint is appropriate.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:
A. That judgment in favor of Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader as to Count I of
the Complaint be, and hereby is, granted; that Anthony Miner O'Connell is hereby removed as
trustee under the Land Trust Agreement dated October 16, 1992, pursuant to Va. Code § 64.21405
(formerly Va. Code § 26-48), effective immediately; and that all fees payable to Anthony
Minor O'Connell under the terms of the Land Trust Agreement, including but not limited to, the
trustee's compensation under paragraph 9~01, and ll interest on advancements by the trustee to .
the trust for payment of real estate taxes pursuant to paragraph 9.03; are hereby disallowed and
deemed forfeited;
B. That judgment in favor of Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader as to Count II of
the Complaint be, and hereby is, granted; that Anthony Minor O'Connell is hereby removed as
trustee of the trust created under the Last Will and Testament of Harold A. O'Connell, pursuant
to Va. Code § 64.2-759 (formerly Va. Code § 55-547.06), effective immediately;
C. That judgment in favor of PlaiIitiff as to Count III ofthe Complaint be, and
hereby is, granted; that Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader is hereby appointed as successor
trustee under the Land Trust Agreement and as trustee of he trust under the Last Will and
Testament of Harold A. O'Connell; that the term of the Land Trust Agreement is hereby
continued until further Order of this Court or until the real property held under the Land Trust is
sold and final distribution of the net proceeds is made to the trust's beneficiaries, whichever
occurs first; and that Plaintiff, as successor trustee Under the Land Trust Agreement, shall
proceed forthwith to sell the real property held by such trust as soon as reasonably practicable
upon such terms and conditions as she deems appropriate and consistent with her fiduciary
duties; and
D. That Plaintiff is hereby awarded her reasonable attorney's fees and costs in this
action in the amount of $ l7,504.12, to be paid from the Land Trust at such time as funds
become available.,
ENTERED this 25th day of January, 2013.
(Seal) (Editor's note: I am guessing that this is the signature of Chief Judge Dennis J. Smith but I am not sure).
Judge
I ASK FOR THIS:
BLANKINGSHIP & KEITH, P. C.·
4020 University Drive .
Suite 300
Fairfax, VA 22030
703~691-1235
FAX: 703-691-3913
By:
Elizabeth Chichester Morrogh, VSB No. 25112
BVMorrogh@bklawva.com
Jennifer L. McCammon, VSB No. 77034
JMcCammon@bklawva.com
Counsel for Plaintiff

Comment on:

"1. The material facts set forth in the Complaint filed by Plaintiff in this action are
deemed to be admitted by Defendant Anthony M. O'Connell pursuant to Va. Sup. Ct. Rule
1:4(e);- based on the failure of Defendant Anthony M. O'Connell to deny such facts in the
responsive pleading filed by him, entitled "Response to Summons Served on September 8,
2012.
"

Please look at my "Response to Summons Served on September 8, 2012." It included a complete copy of my Deed as Trustee. Ignoring my Deed as Trustee blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. No one recognizes this. No one. www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/overview62p.pdf

Please look at my seventeen responses that disappeared after being received by the Court on 9/25/2012.

 1   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/1-545820-23p.pdf
 2   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/2-bk467p191-8p.pdf
 3   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/3-blueprint4p.pdf
 4   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/4-canweconnectthedots2p.pdf
 5   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/5-codeofconduct18p.pdf
 6   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/6-commitments-Individually8p.pdf
 7   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/7-compute-tax-test35p.pdf
 8   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/8-exceptions1994disappeared.pdf
 9   www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/9-exceptions2000disappeared.pdf
10  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/10-overview72p.pdf                          (Includes complete Deed)
11  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/11-percentages12p.pdf            
12  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/12-precedence17p.pdf
13  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/13-tax-records94p.pdf
14  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/14-trust-deed-invisible175p.pdf       (Includes complete Deed)
15  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/15-trust-documents42p.pdf              (Includes complete Deed)
16  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/16-unknown14p.pdf                         (Includes first 3 pages of Deed)
17  www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/17-usingIRS15p.p
      www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/all-18responses714p.pdf                  (Includes multile copies of Deed)
   

Complaint - www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/complaint60p.pdf
My responses - www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/all18responses714p.pdf
My email verifying 18 responses - www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/email-verifying18responses3p.pdf
Order - www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/order5p.pdf

7

They plant hooks (aka accounting entanglements, wedges, confusion and conflict) in the family and make the family appear responsible for the consequences. Who ever controls the hook controls the people and assets that are hooked. A simple example is 1,475 - 816 = 659. Small numbers are used to make them appear unworrthy of attention, as if the issue is the amount. The issue is not the amount. The issue is that they entangle. They are a hook. "Debt fm Harold O'Connell Trust  659.97" entangles the accounting for the Testamentary Trust with the accounting for our Mother's Estate. Both accounts were done by the CPA and lawyer. To show the importance of this pattern, try to get anyone in the Court, the County, or the Commonwealth of Virginia, to recognize the accounting item "Debt fm Harold O'Connell Trust ... 659.97" at bk467p192money.com -

Reference:

"1. The material facts set forth in the Complaint filed by Plaintiff in this action are
deemed to be admitted by Defendant Anthony M. O'Connell pursuant to Va. Sup. Ct. Rule
1:4(e);- based on the failure of Defendant Anthony M. O'Connell to deny such facts in the
responsive pleading filed by him, entitled "Response to Summons Served on September 8,2012."
(From Chief Judge Smith's Order of January 15, 2013)

Complaint - www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/complaint60p.pdf
My responses - www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/all18responses714p.pdf
My email verifying 18 responses - www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/email-verifying18responses3p.pdf
Order - www.chiefjudgesmith.com/evidence/order5p.pdf

I anticipated something like this so I verified that they were sent in three ways: By USPS return receipt, by email to multiple recipients, and by letter to Chief Judge Dennis J. Smith. On 9/25/2012, seventeen (17) of my responses were received by the Court at 10:44 AM. Stephanie Walker signed for them. They weighed 6 lbs and 1 oz and cost $62.85 to ship.  USPS EI480187651US. 

Going right for the jugular under the guise of a fiduciary relationship appears to be the perfect cover. The secrecy is impenetrable. Secrecy is essential to the fraudsters and fatal to the family. The secrecy is impenetrable. Please ask Virginia Senators Mark Warner and Tim Kaine to break the secrecy. If they don't, I don't believe anyone in Virginia will. The public should know what can happen to them if they try to expose the fraudster's accounting.

(below) Two lawyers pattern

The fraudsters signature cover is to divide, destabilize, and disempower, the family they victimize. Secrecy is essential to the fraudsters and fatal to the family. Invisible walls blocking communication between family members are essential. The fraudsters cannot work if they cannot establish a policy of secrecy between family members. If your family does not accept the policy of secrecy, the fraudsters will leave. Never, never, never, agree to secrecy between family members.

A basic pattern is get the family to hire two lawyers. The only thing they need is your trust. One family member hires lawyer 1 to represent the whole family. But lawyer 1 conceals himself and does no work. Another family member, seeing that no work is being done, hires lawyer 2 to represent the whole family. Then lawyer 1 comes out of hiding and pretends to represent only a part of the family. And makes the remaining part of the family an adversary. Lawyer 2 is left to represent the "adversary".

When you have two lawyers, one supposedly working for one family member and one working for another, they can legally justify secrecy by calling it client - lawyer confidentiality. If you recognize the two lawyer pattern you still have to choose between getting legal advice by hiring another lawyer, or forgo legal advice by not hiring another lawyer.

The CPA - lawyer hook our homeplace.
("Deed to property - convey to court", "Agreement")

Who ever controls the hooks controls the people and assets that are hooked. The CPA and lawyer use the hooks to divide, destablize, and disempower the family they victimize; supplant the family fiduciaries; take control of the family's assets; and make money disappear. This advice that our Mother trusted are hooks. - "I had hoped that the procedure of setting up the trust could be simplified by putting title tothe resident estate (my home) in the names of my three children - the same as listed in the will to receive it to receive it." are hooks.

The Dreyfus Affair.

The public should know, based on my experience what will happen to them if they try to expose the fraudster's accounting. I've been set up and character assasinated since 1985 for trying to break through the secrecy. It reminds me of the Dreyfus Affair. A French military officer of Jewish descent is falsely accused, convicted. and sent to Devil's Island. The French Governtment and military don't like it when their coverup is exposed by Emile Zola's newspaper article. Zola, the figure being pointed to in Edoward Manet's painting, is sentenced to a year in prison.

Whistle blower retaliations
Kill the messernger  

(3)  Surprise, April 21, 1988. Deed says I could not qualify as Trustee.

1988.04.21   (Deed prepared by ___ ? In part)
"Whereas by Deed of Partition recorded in Deed Book 4026 at Page 454, the property was reconveyed to Harold A. O'Connell as to an undivided one-half interest and to Jean M. O'Connell, as to an undivided one-half interest, whereas, Harold A. O'Connell died testate May 26, 1975, and by his Last Will and Testament recorded in Will Book 201 at Page 96, devised his interest to his executor Anthony M. O'Connell, Trustee; whereas Anthony M. O'Connell, Trustee, could not qualify and Herbert A. Higham, Trustee, was appointed to act in his place and stead.

Comment: This was my sale. I found the Buyer. I negoiated the sales contract with Bill Lynch. The sales contract says the Seller is one legal entity and I am the point of contact for the Seller:
www.canweconnectthedots/sale88/home.html

Anyone representing the "Seller" represents all of the grantors comprising the "Seller". All or none of the grantors comprising the "Seller" are represented. The "Seller" can not be divided.)

What ever the lawyer fixed, and apparently had our Mother come into Court to sign, remains concealed. My guess is that the fraudsters instructed our Mother to come in to the Court to sign something under the guise that it was a usual and customary document concerning a bond and/or non-resident fiduciaries. I believe the actual intent was to block me from qualifying as Trustee.

My best guess is that this still unknown something is actually intended and use to shut me out, to justify saying that the non-resident fiduciary Anthony O'Connell could not qualify as Trustee for the Testamentary Trust established by our Dad's Will probated in 1976.

Edward White - Edward White is an attorney who, I believe, the CPA Joanne Barnes connected to our Mother. All this is a secret from me, the named Trustee in the Testamentary Trust established by our Dad's Will, probated in 1976. (What happened between 1976 and 1985? I don't know. The nine years of secrecy suggest, I believe, that the CPA Joanne Barnes made millions of dollars disappear.) Neither the CPA or the attorney, who pretend they don't know each other, contacted me about anything. Our Mother apparently bought their policy of secrecy and that was fatal.

Henry Mackall - I was visiting my Mother when she showed me the out going Commissione of Accounts letter dated May 8, 1985. It said the Testamentary Trust established by our Father's Will, probated in 1976, had to be funded.

(Comment: Why would Mr. Mackall have me come from Saint Louis, Missouri, to Fairfax, Virginia, to qualify in Court? But after my telling him that the named non-resident trustee H. A. Higham and I have known each other since high school, ask us to wait outside the Court while he went in by himself? And after coming out tell us that there was a bond broblem that prevents us (or just Anthny OConnell? I don't remember the exact words)What is the bond problem document Mr. Mackall ran into?)

History suggest that the clause "ANTHONY MINER O’CONNELL, Trustee Under the Last Will and Testament of Harold A. O’Connell" in the 1992 Trust documents such as the deed for Accotink will not be recognized in the settlement of a sale of Accotink and what ever might be used to justify it not being recognized will remain unknown:

Comment: Why would Mr. Mackall have me come from Saint Louis, Missouri, to Fairfax, Virginia, to qualify in Court? My physical presence wasn't deemed necessary when he had me and Mr. H. A. Higham qualified on June x, 1986.

* My guess for Mr Mackall telling us to wait outside is that the level of trust between me and and H. A. Higham would interfere with the "lawyer fix" obstacle that apparently disqualified me as Trustee but not H. A. Higham.

www.book8307page1446deed.com/deed-webs/deed-webs-home.html

History suggest that the clause "ANTHONY MINER O’CONNELL, Trustee Under the Last Will and Testament of Harold A. O’Connell" in the 1992 Trust documents such as the deed for Accotink will not be recognized in the settlement of a sale of Accotink and what ever might be used to justify it not being recognized will remain unknown:

This pattern of unknowns is one reason why the sale of Accotink had to be on hold. Can we find out what the lawyer fixed? Can we get the accountants to take a position on whether Anthony O'Connell did, or did not, qualify as co-trustee u/w of H. A. O'Connell on June 20, 1986, and that he was still qualified as co-trustee u/w of H. A. O'Connell on October 16, 1992, when he signed the 1992 for Accotink as one of the Grantors, so that all concerned can rely upon it? It's been thirty-two years now.

To get to the truth it is absolutely essential to expose the document(s)(?) that the accountants had our Mother come in to the Court and sign. This is core. History suggests that our Mother and her family did not have a chance against the accountants after she followed the "lawyer fix" and "come in" instructions.

1) Plant obstacle.
1985-1986, plant "lawyer fix" obstacle in the Court records to block me from qualifying as Trustee. Frame Jean OConnell (Mother) with it by instructing her to carry it out. Keep it secret in the Court records so it can be shown or concealed depending on the situation.

2) "Lawyer fix" obstacle blocking me from qualifing as trustee is made to appear as my refusal to qualify as Trustee. And therefore I should be removed as Trustee.

I am guessing that the the media doesn't tell the public how the accounting fraud works because they don't want to risk being sued for libel.

I believe this Court Notice says I am to travel from Arizona to Fairfax, Virginia, for a hearing for an unidentified issue where no evidence will be taken. I believe "In re: Harold A. O'Connell" means my 1992 Deed as Trustee will continue to be ignored.

(Insert judges 2000 link) http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/judges2000/judges2000home.html

Insert bk467p191, page 1

Why isn't my 1992 Deed as Trustee recognized?

Ignoring my Deed as Trustee and not saying why rendered me powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. My family doesn't understand this. http://www.book8307page1446deed.com

And by extension, make my1992 Deed as Trustee null and void? I signed the 1992 Trust Deed as one of the Grantors; as "Anthony Miner O'Connell, Trustee, under the last Will and Testament of Harold A. O'Connell"? Is there a just power who would risk breaking the secrecy and finding out?

 

 



http://www.659trail.com     
http://www.alexandriavirginia15acres.com   
http://www.book467page191money.com              
http://www.book8307page1446deed.com   
http://www.canweconnectthedots.com      (Best reference)     
http://www.canwelookattheevidence.com 
http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com   
http://www.chiefjudgetrumbo.com
http://www.farm139.com
http://www.fbispringfield.com
http://www.followthetrails.com
http://www.followthetrails2013.com
http://www.inreharoldaoconnell.com
http://www.judgesfairfaxcounty.com      
http://www.removethesecrecy.com  
http://www.stoppedmedicine.com     
http://www.tucsonva.com 
http://www.unknownlien.com