The public needs a free press to show them how this accounting fraud works. Their signature cover is to divide and conquer the family they victimize. They make it appear as if the family destroyed itself fighting over money. Please understand that they intentionally destroy your family to coverup their accounting.


Plant 659
(1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97)

"Int fm Harold O'Connell Trust  ......................................... 816.00 "(Estate accounting at bk467p192)
"Debt fm Harold O’Connell Trust ...................................... 659.97 "(Estate accounting at bk467p192)
"Payable to the Estate of Jean M. O'Connell ... ... .... ... $ 1,475.97" (Trust accounting at bk480p1768)
(Commissioner of Accounts Jesse B. Wilson, III, approved these accounting trails)

"Plant 659" represents the simplest example of an accounting entanglement. An accounting entanglement as the term is used here is the intentional planting of confusion and conflict in the accounting and making it appear as the victim's fault.

Whoever controls the accounting entanglement (the accountants) controls the people and assets that are entangled. Behind this wall of confision and conflict the accountants can do most anything they want and make it appear as the visctim's fault. Entanglements are used as a wedge and takeover tool and as cover. Small numbers are used to make the issue appear insignificant as if the issue were the amount. The issue is not the anount. The issue is that they entangle . One indicator of their importance is the amount of effort gone to prevent them from being recognized.

The simplest example is 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97. It was created by the CPA Joanne Barnes reporting different numbers to different entities when the numbers should be the same. In the Trust accounting the CPA reported 1,475.95 for the Court and 816.00 for the IRS when the numbers should be the same. In the Estate accounting she reported the difference of 659.97 to the Count and the IRS. If you can recognize the dynamics in 1,475.97 - 816.00 = 659.97 you can recognize the same dynamics in the far more complicated examples. Such as the other entanglements I am being framed with in Edward White's letter of May 19, 1992.

Let Plant 659 represent all the entanglemnts described in the Attorney's letter of May 19, 1992, and all the entanglements covering the accounting trails in our Mother's Estate at bk467p191.