The public needs a free press to show them how this accounting fraud works. Their signature cover is to divide and conquer the family they victimize. They make it appear as if the family destroyed itself fighting over money. Please understand that they intentionally destroy your family to coverup their accounting.

 

Old home
chiefjudgesmith.com


Dear Virginia Senators Mark Warner and Tim Kaine,

As former Governors of Virginia, with law degrees from Harvard, perhaps you know better than anyone - Why is this accounting fraud protected instead of the public?  

Please have Virginia recognize this Deed or say why it should not be recognized. Ignoring the deed is one way they take over property. It's been 25 years now.  http://www.book8307page1446deed.com

Please stop them from using our innocent sister in Pennsylvania. Dividing, destabilizing, and disempowering the family they victimize is the perfect cover: It's been 25 years now: Jean O'Connell Nader, 350 Fourth Avenue, New Kensington, PA 15068 (724)-337-7537.

Please have Virginia expose this accounting. When $545,820.43 is paid to our Mother's Estate, but recorded as $26,917.17 paid instead of $545,820.43 paid, it means $518,903.26 disappeared. It's been 24 years now.  http://www.book467page191money.com

Please ask VA Secretary David J. Shulkin <david.shulkin@va.gov> to stop the VA from targeting me. There is a VA frame up in progress now [May 17, 2017]. Please expose the trails of the Phoenix VA's letter and the covert lien to Highland County, Virginia, which converge on May 10-11, 2012.  http://www.tucsonva.com

I am being disempowered to death for trying to expose accounting. Since 1985. That's 31 years. It feels as if I have been made an enemy of the States of Virginia and Arizona, the VA, and others. It feels as if the FBI has put out an all points bulletin to urge the Establishment to disempower me and the functionaries are promised immunity if not a reward. I know the FBI would not do this.

Why is this accounting fraud protected instead of the public?  https://twitter.com/_/status/864890758867943424

*  *  *

The public should know how this accounting fraud works. They are above the law, ruthless, and invisible. Their signature cover is to divide, destablize, and disempower the families they victimize. It is the perfect cover. They use our sister; Jean O'Connell Nader, 350 Fourth Avenue, New Kensington, PA 15068, (724)-337-7537). There is no known power who will try to stop them from doing this.

Our Mother did not want assets to disappear from her estate or her family torn apart to cover it up. I believe I have been given a virtual death sentence for trying to expose the accounting. The Complaint prepared by the B&K law firm, Chief Judge Smith's Order approving it, the covert lien sent to Highland County by the TACS law firm, and the Phoenix VA's letter of May 10, 2012, are fraudulent. http://www.tucsonva.com

History suggests the covert lien to Highland County alone would be used to jerk me around indefinitely if I try to sell my farm. And it will be made to appear as my fault. The deed to my 15 acres (as Trustee) in Fairfax County has been ignored since 1992. This blocked me from selling the Trust property. And it was made to appear as my fault. http://www.book8307page1446deed.com

Common sense would have to be exercised to verify this. The secrecy would have to be removed. The trails would have to be exposed, followed, and recognized. The difference between empirical evidence and cover has to be recognized. I've been setup and character assassinated since 1985. This is cover. From at least hundreds, if not a thousand, sources by now.

Common sense means $545,820.43 received by the estate, but recorded as $26,917.17 received by the estate, means $518,903.26 disappeared. Common sense means the only thing needed to know that the accounting should be exposed, is that it has never been exposed.

The public should know. This accounting fraud will have me killed for trying to expose their accounting unless the law is enforced. Does the establishment understand what I am saying? Would anyone in the establishment ask that the law be enforced; that this accounting be exposed?  http://www.book467page191money.com


*  *  *

This is a straightforward example of framing me. Seventeen (17) of my eighteen (18) responses to the fraudulent Complaint disappeared after being received by the Court. The images below are the first page of each of these 17 responses. The link below each image is to a complete copy of the response in pdf. Would anyone in the establishment ask that the law be enforced here; that these seventeen responses be addressed?

How is it possible that my Deed, as Trustee, which has been in the Court records since October 23, 1992, is not recognized? Or it said why it should not be recognized? This rendered be powerless. It blocked me from selling the Trust property and forced me to pay the real estate taxes until I ran out of money. It sabotaged my work. The public has no chance against this. If a just power cannot be found to enforce the law on this, when could a just power be found to enforce the law here?

 1   http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/1-545820-23p.pdf
 2   http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/2-bk467p191-8p.pdf
 3   http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/3-blueprint4p.pdf
 4   http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/4-canweconnectthedots2p.pdf
 5   http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/5-codeofconduct18p.pdf
 6   http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/6-commitments-Individually8p.pdf
 7   http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/7-compute-tax-test35p.pdf
 8   http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/8-exceptions1994disappeared.pdf
 9   http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/9-exceptions2000disappeared.pdf
10  http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/10-overview72p.pdf   (Includes complete Deed)
11  http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/11-percentages12p.pdf
12  http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/12-precedence17p.pdf
13  http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/13-tax-records94p.pdf
14  http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/14-trust-deed-invisible175p.pdf   (Includes complete Deed)
15  http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/15-trust-documents42p.pdf   (Includes complete Deed)
16  http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/16-unknown14p.pdf   (Includes first 3 pages of Deed)
17  http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/17-usingIRS15p.pdf

      http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/Received9-25-12_11p.pdf  (Includes complete Deed)
      http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/all-18responses714p.pdf

Seventeen (17) of my responses to the Complaint were received by the Court on 9/25/2012 at 10:44 AM. Stephanie Walker signed for them. They weighed 6 lbs and 1 oz and cost $62.85 to ship.  USPS EI480187651U

USPS EI480187651US
chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/Received9-25-12_11p.pdf

The following pages are the front pages of my seventeen (17) responses that vanished after being received by the Court on 9/25/2012 at 10:44 AM. Stephanie Walker signed for it. It weighed 6 lbs and 1 oz and cost $62.85.  USPS EI480187651US



1
www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/1-545820-23p.pdf



2
chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/2-bk467p191-8p.pdf



3
www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/3-blueprint4p.pdf



4
www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/4-canweconnectthedots2p.pdf



5
www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/5-codeofconduct18p.pdf



6
www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/6-commitments-Individually8p.pdf



7
www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/7-compute-tax-test35p.pdf



8
www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/8-exceptions1994disappeared.pdf



9
www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/9-exceptions2000disappeared.pdf



10
www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/10-overview72p.pdf



11
www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/11-percentages12p.pdf



12
www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/12-precedence17p.pdf



13
www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/13-tax-records94p.pdf



14
www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/14-trust-deed-invisible175p.pdf



15
www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/15-trust-documents42p.pdf



16
chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/16-unknown14p.pdf



1
www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/17-usingIRS15p.pdf

/www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/all-18responses714p.pdf




www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/Received9-24-12_3p.pdf



1  http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/overview62p.pdf

(Above) This is the front page of the one (1) response apparently recognized as being received by the Court. It was received by the Court on 9/24/2012 at 10:01 AM. Rodney Bass signed for it. It weighed 12 ounces and cost $18.95. USPS EI637303496. Please click the link  http://www.chiefjudgesmith.com/18responses/overview62p.pdf  and compare what you see with that of B&K's Elizabeth Chichester Morrogh's September 28, 2012, description of it:
"Upon information and belief, Defendant Anthony M. O'Connell has filed a response to the Complaint, which consisted of a one-page letter directed to the Clerk of Court, and the filing of numerous documents and records containing his annotations."

***************************************************************************************************

 





 





 





 


Order
Chief Judge Dennis J. Smith, January 25. 2013
(Note: I believe "are deemed to be admitted by Defendant" means Judge Smith says I'm guilty)

2013.01.25
ORDER
THIS CAUSE eame on to be heard upon the motion of the Plaintiff, Jean Mary O'Connell Nader, by counsel, for summary judgment pursuant to Va. Sup. Ct. Rule 3:20; upon the reply to the motion filed by Sheila Ann O'Connell, pro se; and upon the argument of counsel; and
IT APPEARING TO THE COURT as follows:
1. The material facts set forth in the Complaint filed by Plaintiff in this action are deemed to be admitted by Defendant Anthony M. O'Connell pursuant to Va. Sup. Ct. Rule 1:4(e);- based on the failure of Defendant Anthony M. O'Connell to deny such facts in the responsive pleading filed by him, entitled "Response to Summons Served on September 8, 2012."
2. In her Answer to the Complaint and Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment, the remaining party-in~interest, Defendant Sheila Aim O'Connell, agrees with the facts set forth in the Complaint and the relief requested by Plaintiff.
3. Because there are no material facts in dispute in this action and the facts alleged in the Complaint support the relief requested therein, summary judgment pursuant to Va. Sup. Ct. Rule. 3:20 on all counts alleged in Plaintiffs Complaint is appropriate.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:
A. That judgment in favor of Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader as to Count 1 of the Complaint be, and hereby is, granted; that Anthony Miner O'Connell is hereby removed as trustee under the Land Trust Agreement dated October 16, 1992, pursuant to Va. Code § ·64.21405 (formerly Va. Code § 26-48), effective immediately; and that all fees payable to Anthony Minor O'Connell under the terms of the Land Trust Agreement, including but not limited to, the trustee's compensation under paragraph 9~01, and all interest on advancements by the trustee to the trust for payment of real estate taxes pursuant to paragraph 9.03; are hereby disallowed and deemed forfeited;
B. That judgment in favor of Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader as to Count II of the Complaint be, and hereby is,granted; that Anthony Minor O'Connell is hereby removed as trustee of the trust created under the Last Will and Testament of Harold A. O'Connell, pursuant to Va. Code § 64.2:-759 (formerly Va. Code § 55-547.06), effective immediately;
C. That judgment in favor of PlaiIitiff as to Count III oft he Complaint be, and hereby is, granted; that Plaintiff Jean Mary O'Connell Nader is here by appointed as successor trustee under the Land Trust Agreement and as trustee of the trust under the Last Will and Testament of Harold A. O'Connell; that the term of the Land Trust Agreement is hereby continued until further Order of this Court or until the real property held under the Land Trust is
sold and final distribution of the net proceeds is made to the trust's beneficiaries, whichever occurs first; and that Plaintiff, as successor trustee Under the Land Trust Agreement, shall proceed forthwith to sell the real property held by such trust as soon as reasonably practicable upon such terms and conditions as she deems appropriate and consistent with her fiduciary duties; and
D. That Plaintiff is hereby awarded reasonable attorney's fees and costs in this action in the amount of $ l7,504.12, to be paid from the Land Trust at such time as funds become available.
ENTERED this 25th day of January, 2013.
(Seal)
Judge Dennis J. Smith

 

Comment: Why do the Motion and Order not recognize, for example, the Trust Deed in 5 of the Trustee's 18 responses?